Abolishing performance ratings not without risk

Published on

Here's some interesting research insight into the perils of abandoning performance ratings.

The thinking tends to be that imposing performance ratings will be counterproductive, reinforce stereotypes, encourage the idea that managers only have to have performance conversations once a year and that the annual performance appraisal system is so time consuming. The obvious answer, abandon it. Hmmm, seems that may not be the answer. Too often, and perhaps not surprisingly, the result is that, instead of encouraging a continuing discussion about performance, no discussion takes place at all or, if it does, the employee does not understand what s/he is being told.

Sadly, the report concludes, most managers are not skilled enough to deliver clear, meaningful messages, without some structure.

Maybe an answer is to keep some structure but also give those managers some training in providing effective feedback - it is, arguably, the most important part of their job after all.

It was the companies who removed ratings and made the review process less formal that ran into trouble. When the process was stripped of all formality, managers just skipped it. Leaving employees in the dark about how they’re doing.

Related Articles

Sexual harassment at work: tick-box training is not enough.

Just 5% of UK employers are prepared for their new legal responsibilities on sexual harassment.

Guest Q&A – Hasting Direct’s Wellbeing Manager

Mark Winterflood joins us to discuss making genuine progress on mental health & wellbeing.

Confronting loneliness: our shared responsibility

Amanda Okill explores the growing concern of loneliness and ways to address it in the modern workplace.

Personnel Today: BBC to ‘act immediately’ on workplace culture review

Ellie Herriot shares her insights with Personnel Today on how tackling everyday poor behaviour is key to preventing workplace scandals.