Negotiating maturely

Published on
No items found.
Share

The events of recent weeks at Grangemouth provide a telling example of the need for maturity in workforce relations. The plant operator seemingly had made it very plain to the workers and their union, Unite, that major spending cuts were necessary to avoid the closure of the petro chemicals plant. They set out very clearly what was required, a pay freeze, no bonus payments and a change to the final salary pension scheme. Apparently assuming that this was mere brinkmanship on the part of the employer, the union recommended to its workers that they reject the deal which they duly did. The result was the announcement that the plant was to close. Their bluff having been called, the union returned to the table to accept the original proposals.

This of course is how the story has unfolded to the outside world. I have only got what the news reporters have told the world and do not know the intricacies of the negotiations. There might be a whole other level to what has gone on but from this view point, and unfolding as it has in the public eye with such devastating impact upon the local economy and the national economy in Scotland, the impression is very far from edifying.

The union appears to have completely miscalculated the position and ignored the very clear warning of the employer of what would happen, and did happen, if the proposals were rejected. What led the union so completely to disbelieve what it was being told in very clear terms? It may be there was an element of the union flexing its muscles and believing it could dictate events, but on the other hand it is hard to believe that it was so disregarding of the plight of its members as to risk the plant closing rather than trying to find a way to reach a compromise.

And why does it appear that politicians were only galvanised to get involved after positions were already being set in stone and a closure was imminent?

Had there been a more mature approach to the negotiations, perhaps on both sides of the table, it might have been possible for the situation to have been properly explained and understood so as to avoid this public relations disaster and the huge angst it must have caused the workers concerned. We must hope that a resolution to this situation is achieved soon for all concerned and that other employers and unions pause to reflect on events here before making and disregarding ultimatums in the future. These issues are too important for a game of bluff. Plain speaking, and plain listening are what is required.

This article first appeared at www.hrmaturity.com

Related Articles

Good listening...it's not all that easy

I can vividly recall a time when a colleague, let's call her Alice, came to see me to talk about some problems she has been experiencing with someone el...

Abolishing performance ratings not without risk

Here's some interesting research insight into the perils of abandoning performance ratings.  The thinking tends to be that imposing performance rat...

Pokemon Go - an HR headache?

So. Pokemon Go has arrived in the UK after huge success in the US and New Zealand. It's a craze sweeping the nation. Whilst some say it's great because ...

HR Magazine: Lab employee wins €10k after HR recorded him

Amanda Okill shares guidance on the role of HR in building trust and fostering a speak up culture.

People Management: Summer party season - advice for employers

Head of Resolution Zoe Wigan writes on the best next steps if inappropriate behaviour occurs.

HR Magazine: Events manager files £250,000 lawsuit after botched summer party

When workplace events go wrong, the consequences can be serious. Zoe Wigan offers practical advice for HR teams on setting expectations, supporting managers, and creating safer, more inclusive social events.